Skip to main content

Managing Difficulties.

The single biggest speedbump on my transition from Individual Contributor to Manager is the realization that I need to hire people that have skills that I don't have, but I'm not sure how to test for those skills to make sure I'm hiring correctly.

Listen, hiring is HARD. It's hard, y'all. Interviews are difficult and as far as I can tell don't actually give a good measure of how a person is going to react or what a person knows. Technical interviews can only do so much, especially when you're hiring for niche positions. Eventually, you just have to make a call and trust you do it right. Sometimes, you get to take a chance on someone who maybe doesn't exactly fit the background, but you like their spirit and you want to give them an opportunity and so you get a great self-learner who is eager for each task and really knows her shit and is working actively to learn more. And that's great!

And then sometimes you give into time pressure and you go with someone who you feel is "fine" and it turns out they don't have the technical chops and for whatever reason they don't trust you enough to just say so, but instead he quits five days into the new job and leave you without a serious technical resource. And that's... not great.

Having conversations with recruiting about who and what to watch for, while trying not to trip over huge landmines around legal liability and bias, can be hard. How do you say to someone "I want you to look for women and people of color, because they consistently over-perform" without getting a call from HR about discriminatory hiring practices, despite the fact that the statement is both true and basically the opposite of discriminatory?

I understand better than ever why the IT industry works on referrals. This is a business where there aren't any good yardsticks for technical expertise other than "I know this person and I know they can do the work I need done". And while it's great that the people I know and the people I trust all have jobs they love, that makes it difficult for me to find people that fit the "I know..." recruiting / hiring mechanism. And I feel like I've made an extra effort to reach out to professionals who don't look like me and who I feel would work well with me, but getting the "available" windows to match up has been a trick and a half.

I wonder, how do other creative / investigative industries do it? Because whatever one may think, IT (and Ops/DevOps in specific) is mostly a creative field: there are very few situations where the problem being worked on is something that can be solved by rote; if it was, it would already be solved and automated. So I wonder: how does, say, the LA Times, or the Kansas City Star, or for that matter the Gresham Local Reader, handle hiring new reporters and editors? What does that industry look like? How is it changing? And is there anything we can learn from the mistakes being made there, without making them ourselves? And can we do it without remaining a terrible industry for diversity, inclusion, and work/life balance?


Popular posts from this blog

Organizing And You: Lessons from Labor History

    I made a joke on Twitter a while ago: Do I need to post the Thomas M Comeau Organizing Principles again? — Jerome Comeau says Defund The Police (@Heronymus) July 15, 2021 and it recently came back up because a member of my family got their first union job and was like "every job should be offering these sorts of benefits" and so I went ahead and wrote down what I remember of what my dad told me. My father had many jobs, but his profession was basically a labor union organizer, and he talked a lot about the bedrock foundation items needed to be serious about organizing collective action. Here's what I remember.    The Thomas M. Comeau Principles of Organizing -- a fundamental list for finding and building worker solidarity from 50 years of Union Involvement. This list is not ranked; all of the principles stated herein are coequal in their importance. Numbering is a rhetorical choice, not a valuation. 1) Be good at your job. Even in an at-will

Money and Happiness as a fungible resource

Money really does buy happiness. Anyone who tells you differently has a vested interest in keeping you poor, unhappy, or both. I know this because I grew up on the ragged edge of poor, and then backed my way into a career in IT, which is where the modern world keeps all the money that isn't in Finance. So I am one of the extreme minority of Generation X that actually had an adulthood that was markedly more financially stable than my parents. And let me tell you: money really does buy happiness. To be clear: at 45 years old, I'm now in a relationship and a period of my life where our household is effectively double-income, no kids. I live in the city, but I own a house, and can only afford to do that because of our combined income. We also have two cars -- one new, one used (though neither of them is getting driven very much these days) -- and we have a small discretionary budget every month for things like videogames, books, and the like. What my brother used to call DAM -- Dic

Activision, Blizzard, Game development, IT, and my personal role in all of that.

 I'm pretty sure if you spend any sort of time at all on Twitter and/or spend any sort of time playing videogames, you are by now at least aware of the lawsuit brought forth by the State of California's Department of Fair Employment and Housing versus Activision Blizzard, Inc., et al. From this point on, I'll add a Content Warning for folks who are sensitive about sexual assault, suicide, and discrimination based on sex, gender, and skin color, as well as crude humor around and about sexual assault , and what the State of California refers to as "a pervasive 'frat boy' culture" around Act/Bliz, especially in the World of Warcraft-associated departments.   Just reading the complaint is hard rowing, even with the clinical legalese in place. The complaint itself is relatively short; 29 pages laying out ten Causes of Action (basically, "these are the legs on which our lawsuit stands"). I'm not sure I have the vocabulary to properly express how a