Skip to main content

#RPGaDay2018 Day 7: How can a Showrunner make the stakes important?

The meta-rule on this is the same as my answer for yesterday, which is: make sure the people at the table (including myself) understand the purpose of the game, have agreed to the purpose, and are all working together to make that purpose a reality for those involved. In other words, make sure everyone's bought in. That said, there's a couple of things that I try to keep in mind when I'm showrunning.

First, don't ask for dice rolls / resource investment / whatever unless the result will be meaningful to someone at the table (and that can be me as the showrunner, or even one or more of the players who aren't being asked to invoke). If there's no narrative reason for the character to fail, then there's no need to test for failure.

Second, get the person who is invoking the point (that is, doing the move, rolling the dice, spending the bennie, whatever) to lay out how invested they are in the result. If they just want the spotlight, or they just want to roll some dice, or they just want to prod the party into movement, then either get them to set the stakes, or recognize that that player needs to be invested, and so invest the invocation with meaning.

Third, don't needlessly escalate. "Suddenly, ninjas!" may be a great way to get the players moving and the table woken up a bit, but it's not always the best way to get buy-in or investment from the folks at the table. I try to get the players to point me in the direction they want things to go, either explicitly or implicitly, by asking them 'so, what do you hope to accomplish with this invocation?' and that usually works pretty well for determining not just which way the story goes, but it is especially effective when I follow it up with 'and how much are you willing to risk for that?' to get an idea of what the value is.

Now, some things are going to be low stakes; not everything is both very important and very urgent. Talk with your players about what the expectations are ahead of time. One player might say that saving the world is worth sacrificing everything; another may say saving the cat is worth everything. Alternately, it may be that saving the world isn't worth getting off the couch, but which inn they stay at is worth a duel to the death. The players are telling everyone (including themselves) what they want from the game, often without realizing it. Recognizing those clues and signposts is both moderately difficult and extremely rewarding, because it requires the showrunner to listen closely and actively to others. This is not a skill that is explicitly valued, but it is a valuable skill.

NB: I've taken to using the term "showrunner" rather than "gamemaster" or the like because I feel like, at least for me, it is less separational than the GM/player traditional terms. I like my games to be collaborative and collective, and I feel like "showrunner" indicates a more 'guide' style rather than 'lead' style.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Organizing And You: Lessons from Labor History

    I made a joke on Twitter a while ago: Do I need to post the Thomas M Comeau Organizing Principles again? https://t.co/QQIrJ9Sd3i — Jerome Comeau says Defund The Police (@Heronymus) July 15, 2021 and it recently came back up because a member of my family got their first union job and was like "every job should be offering these sorts of benefits" and so I went ahead and wrote down what I remember of what my dad told me. My father had many jobs, but his profession was basically a labor union organizer, and he talked a lot about the bedrock foundation items needed to be serious about organizing collective action. Here's what I remember.    The Thomas M. Comeau Principles of Organizing -- a fundamental list for finding and building worker solidarity from 50 years of Union Involvement. This list is not ranked; all of the principles stated herein are coequal in their importance. Numbering is a rhetorical choice, not a valuation. 1) Be good at your job. Even in an at-will

Activision, Blizzard, Game development, IT, and my personal role in all of that.

 I'm pretty sure if you spend any sort of time at all on Twitter and/or spend any sort of time playing videogames, you are by now at least aware of the lawsuit brought forth by the State of California's Department of Fair Employment and Housing versus Activision Blizzard, Inc., et al. From this point on, I'll add a Content Warning for folks who are sensitive about sexual assault, suicide, and discrimination based on sex, gender, and skin color, as well as crude humor around and about sexual assault , and what the State of California refers to as "a pervasive 'frat boy' culture" around Act/Bliz, especially in the World of Warcraft-associated departments.   Just reading the complaint is hard rowing, even with the clinical legalese in place. The complaint itself is relatively short; 29 pages laying out ten Causes of Action (basically, "these are the legs on which our lawsuit stands"). I'm not sure I have the vocabulary to properly express how a

Money and Happiness as a fungible resource

Money really does buy happiness. Anyone who tells you differently has a vested interest in keeping you poor, unhappy, or both. I know this because I grew up on the ragged edge of poor, and then backed my way into a career in IT, which is where the modern world keeps all the money that isn't in Finance. So I am one of the extreme minority of Generation X that actually had an adulthood that was markedly more financially stable than my parents. And let me tell you: money really does buy happiness. To be clear: at 45 years old, I'm now in a relationship and a period of my life where our household is effectively double-income, no kids. I live in the city, but I own a house, and can only afford to do that because of our combined income. We also have two cars -- one new, one used (though neither of them is getting driven very much these days) -- and we have a small discretionary budget every month for things like videogames, books, and the like. What my brother used to call DAM -- Dic